2.9. Evaluation risks
This section should articulate the risks or limitations that the evaluation faces, not the risks of the program in general. If significant mitigatable risks are identified, the risk assessment plan will help program managers to implement appropriate controls.
In terms of risks associated with the accuracy of the program logic, one way to combat potential overconfidence and realistically assess risk is to imagine program failure and then think through how that failure would happen.[1] It may also be useful to review previous evaluations from a similar program to identify lessons learned and how they may apply to this evaluation.
Risk categories may include: stakeholder engagement and support, technology, data, funding, timeframes, regulatory or ethical issues, physical or environmental issues.
Table 14: Example risk assessment plan
| Description | Consequence | Analysis* | Current control | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood | Consequence | Risk rating | |||
| Poor stakeholder participation in research | The evaluation would lack descriptive information about perceptions | Possible | Moderate | Moderate | A variety of intercept surveys, focus groups, telephone, internet-based surveys and information conversation methods will be used to encourage maximum stakeholder participation |
*Use the likelihood and consequence rating matrix in the Evaluation work plan template. Choose one of the following to define the likelihood of the risk occurring.
Table 15: Risk likelihood challenges
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| Rare | may only occur in exceptional circumstances |
| Unlikely | is not expected to occur |
| Possible | could occur at some time |
| Likely | would probably occur in most circumstances |
| Almost certain | is expected to occur in most circumstances |
Choose one of the following to define the consequence if the risk occurs.
Table 16: Risk consequence categories
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| Negligible | the consequences are dealt with by routine operations |
| Low | impacts on a limited aspect of the activity |
| Moderate | moderate impact on the achievement of goals/objectives |
| High | high impact on the achievement of goals/objectives |
| Extreme | significant impact on the achievement of goals/objectives |
Use the likelihood and risk rating to determine the overall risk rating. Those that are high or extreme are likely to require closer monitoring than those that are moderate or low.
Table 17: Overall risk rating matrix
[1] M. K. Gugerty, D. Karlan, The Goldilocks Challenge: Right Fit Evidence for the Social Sector, New York, Oxford University Press, 2018.
Last updated: 14 December 2020
Give feedback about this page.
Share this page:
URL copied!